South Carolina

  Trial Attorney.
HOME ABOUT US FAQ'S RESOURCES CONTACT US FREE CASE REVIEW
August 24, 2010
Trial-Lawyer
             
 
Selecting an attorney for legal cases is a very important decision. Please enter your information below to receive a Free Consultation from an attorney in your area:
 
Zip Code:   
 

Trial News

 

United States Published In The Federal Register A Revised Proposed Final Judgment

As required under the Tunney Act, on November 28, 2001, the United States published in the Federal Register a Revised Proposed Final Judgment, a Competitive Impact Statement, and detailed procedures for the submission of public comments regarding the United States' proposed settlement with Microsoft. The 60-day public comment period lasted from November 28, 2001 through January 28, 2002. During that period, the United States received 32,392 comments from the public. Of these comments, the United States categorized 47 of these comments as "major." The United States provided the "major" comments to the Court on February 14, 2002, and subsequently published these comments on the Antitrust Division website.

On March 1, 2002, the United States made the full text of the public comments available for downloading and viewing on the Antitrust Division's website by implementing the procedure detailed in the United States' Motion for Leave of Court to Adopt an Alternative Procedure for Comment Publication . On May 3, 2002, the full text of the public comments was also published in the Federal Register.

Since November 21, 2004, the United States has received inquiries from six citizens requesting that some portion of the comments that they had submitted during the Tunney Act comment period be removed from the Antitrust Division's website. Generally, these citizens have requested that their personal information be removed from the Internet due to privacy concerns. None of these requests were related to the "major" comments.

Given that citizens have started to request removal of their comments and that the full text of the public comments will continue to be available to the public through the Federal Register and upon request from the United States, the United States believes it would be appropriate to remove these non-major comments from the Antitrust Division's website. The comments will still be widely available to the public and this will permit the United States to respond to what appear to be reasonable privacy concerns.

Therefore, subject to the Court's concurrence, the United States plans to remove all of the public comments not categorized as "major" from the Antitrust Division's website.

Contact our South Carolina Trial Lawyer Now!

 

 
Did You Know?    
 
 
 


  News Room  
 


Latest news about Trial Attorney.com cases in South Carolina and nationwide:

Trial Lawyer Lawsuits, Excessive Government Health Care Mandates Cause Jump in Ranks of Uninsured
Bipartisan Health Care Access Legislation Stalled in Congress by Democrat Leaders with Close Ties to Trial Lawyers

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Citin...

Read more >


The History of the United States Court of Federal Claims
The United States Court of Federal Claims was recreated pursuant to Article I of the United States Constitution in October 1982, by the Federal Cou...
Read more >


Jurors' Duties During The Trial
Do not talk to others about the case. This responsibility requires that you not talk at all with the lawyers, witnesses, or anyone else connected w...
Read more >


More Trial News >

 
 

Trial Terms

 


Today's Terms

Accusatory Instrument

Definition:
A written accusation filed with the court charging the defendant with one or more offenses.

Hearing

Definition:
A court proceeding where testimony is given, exhibits are reviewed, and/or legal arguments are made to help a judge decide an issue in a case.

Bill Of Particulars

Definition:
A written statement or specification of the details of the demand for which an action at law is brought.

More Trial Terms >

 

Search Site:

 
 

Trial Law Resources

 


Search Trial resources in our resource center:

More Resources >

 

Trial Law Hot Topics

 


Topics Related to Trial:

  • Criminal Procedure 
  • Civil Procedure 
  • Appellate Procedure 
  • Legal Ethics
  • Civil Trials

More Trial Topics >

South Carolina Trial-Lawyer Attorney

 
If you live in the following cities and need an Trial-Lawyer attorney you should contact our Trial-Lawyer Attorney as soon as possible:

  • Abbeville
  • Aiken
  • Anderson
  • Beaufort
  • Belton
  • Bennettsville
  • Bluffton
  • Camden
  • Charleston
  • Chester
  • Clemson
  • Clover
  • Columbia
  • Conway
  • Darlington
  • Dillon
  • Easley
  • Elgin
  • Florence
  • Fort Mill
  • Fountain Inn
  • Gaffney
  • Gaston
  • Georgetown
  • Goose Creek
  • Greenville
  • Greenwood
  • Greer
  • Hartsville
  • Hilton Head Island
  • Inman
  • Irmo
  • Ladson
  • Lancaster
  • Laurens
  • Lexington
  • Marion
  • Moncks Corner
  • Mount Pleasant
  • Murrells Inlet
  • Myrtle Beach
  • Newberry
  • North Augusta
  • North Charleston
  • Orangeburg
  • Pickens
  • Piedmont
  • Rock Hill
  • Seneca
  • Simpsonville
  • Spartanburg
  • Summerville
  • Sumter
  • Taylors
  • Travelers Rest
  • Union
  • Walterboro
  • West Columbia
  • York
 


Legal Disclaimers
All attorney listings are a paid attorney advertisement, and do not in any way constitute a referral or endorsement by an approved or authorized lawyer referral service. The information provided on South Carolina Trial Attorney.com is not intended to be legal advice, but merely conveys general information related to legal issues commonly encountered. Your access to and use of this website is subject to additional Terms and Conditions.

Local Professional? Generate new business today
Call 866-227-9356 or contact a sales rep


This site is part of the LawFirms.com Network
©2010 ExpertHub, wholly owned subsidiary of MoxyMedia, Inc.